Skip to main content

Tell Me More

Tell Me Why You Think That!
Do students learn better when they aim to agree or when they debate an issue?  It's a trick question, as David and Roger Johnson point out in their meta-analysis of discussion modes: it turns out that guiding students to engage in controversy in constructive ways leads to greater cognitive and affective gains than either of the typically practiced models of concurrence or debate.

Academic Controversy. Is a discussion format in which students switch roles after arguing their points.  Seeing the issue from another's perspective can be truly enlightening, and it helps students to engage in active listening--good for their interpersonal relationships in class and for increasingly the level of complexity with which they see a given topic.  Tough Talk is a recent book on the topic which has challenged my thinking.

Role-Playing leads students to have both the dramatic immediacy of arguing in role and the perspective of a broad view that they construct across roles as they listen to their classmates. And it's fun!  In a recent lesson centering on the teaching of the Kite Runner, I asked my students to discuss the U.S. response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan by taking on the roles of U.S. Senator, Charlie Wilson, Soviet leader, Leonids Brezhnev, a woman sympathetic to the Mujahedin resistance forces in Afghanistan, and a U.S. voter favoring an isolationist stance.  The students offered their opinions, and then they switched roles to argue a counterpoint.  In all, they came to a more complex view of the topic than they otherwise would have, and they engaged in a respectful debate in the process.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Affective Learning

Pundits abound with promises that technology can "replace the middleman" in education.  Although I grate against the idea that a thoughtful, concerned, reflective, intelligent, passionate, caring adult--a teacher!--is the equivalent to a business owner who marks up merchandise for profit, the metaphor of the middleman forced me to think about just what, exactly, does the teacher add in a cloud-based, post-2007 , MOOC world, where a myriad of apps and sites (e.g. Khan Academy) can tailor feedback and where content has gotten so cheap (e.g. MIT's free courses, or sites like Coursera --featuring coursework from Stanford, UPenn, and Johns Hopkins--or nifty-looking courses like "Analytics in Course Design" through Dartmouth via Canvas ). Surely, teachers are not simply haggling with students for a better price on learning!  But just the same, I am asking myself what is the value-added I am bringing to my students that cannot be replaced. But if teachers are middle...

Expressing Voice - Poetry Out Loud

Significant Learning: Expressing Voice The homogenizing forces in education seem to abound these days, with standardized testing, teacher evaluation, and politics involved.  I find that my soul sings as a teacher when I find something worthwhile for my particular students and polishing and prepare it for them in particular, adjusting, tinkering and making it real for them.  In this act of curricular creation, I am expressing my voice as a teacher (albeit filtered through Common Core standards and common assessments). In turn, we need to create the space to allow students to voice their own ideas and concerns and to take the ideas seriously enough that they can be of consequence.  For example, rather than simply an academic study of poetry, students at my high school learn to perform in through poetryoutloud.org .  Such a shift pushes the learning target away from knowledge exclusively toward product, which represents a shift in the ways of knowing and the configu...