Skip to main content

BOOK REVIEW





Book Review

If this book is filled with so much common sense--offer choice, give students a voice in their learning-- then why do I find myself invigorated by the potential of my students as I read it?

We want to offer answers, students want questions. We offer safety, they love risk. We want them to play the role of the dutiful student, and they want to play a socially important role, an expert or daring personality. Basically, Armstrong drives home the point that the intense neuroplasticity of adolescent brains makes teaching teens a bit of wild fun, but it's not a game whose rules we, as adults, often fully understand or remember.


For example, one chapter focuses on peer learning communities. In my experience, and through my home school district, we have focused consistently on Cooperative Learning modalities which are informed by the research of David and Roger Johnson at the University of Minnesota. They remind us that cooperative learning is not an activity to do, but it is an awareness that everything that goes on in the classroom should be viewed with the lens of the social scientist. Armstrong, here, offers a similar insight but gets us, as teachers and leaders, to understand the biological bases for this.


In the past 10 years or so, differentiated instruction has continued to enter into the instructional conversation at the high school level. We are learning what our grade school colleagues have been telling us for decades: offering choice and recognizing the important sense of agency in our adolescent learners are really of central concern to the educational process. And yet, we often standardize our approach, and in so doing, we abdicate our own choice to offer students this kind of agency. Armstrong leans into this important issue with specific learning ideas such as homework menus.


Like all brain-based books, the work here tends to over-conclude based on the amount of empirical data available. However, Armstrong is a veteran teacher whose sensibilities--developed over 34 years in the classroom--very much run sympatico with my own. His ideas are practical, and his tone energizes my vision for what my students will accomplish this year.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blended Learning ELA White Paper Musings/Draft

Vision of Blended Learning ELA -- White Paper This vision concerns how implement Blended Learning in the High School setting, in an ELA department in particular.   What is Blended Learning?  In a secondary school ELA department, we see the opportunity to focus our work on three modes of interaction, each with several variations ( image link/credit ).  The result, we feel, will be a constructivist learning space, in which teachers and students address literary texts, literacy skills, and real-world problems in a problem-based learning format. The primary educational mode is still face-to-face interaction, even in a blended classroom.  Nothing seems to be quite able to substitute for the caring, insightful, focused presence of a teacher or coach, on hand and engaged with the learner in the content or skill being learned.  In ELA, a discussion of social class in The Great Gatsby benefits greatly from seeing the reactions on classmates' or the teacher's face w...

Synthesis Writing

Synthesis Writing involving The Role of Women & The Scarlet Letter Conflicting Sources. What does it mean to have students write meaningfully about sources that conflict? In this attached writing prompt, students evaluate Hester Prynne, a character whom Nathaniel Hawthorne posits as strong, capable and independent in chapters 12-15 of the novel. The question is whether or not the students think that she is a strong female character by today's standards. Embedded in this prompt is a problem or controversy that the students have had some interest in addressing, even though the documents are challenging. Charting an Inquiry. Prior to today's class, students have examined other synthesis prompts together, charting how the sources conflict and setting up how each of them would proceed through them. Today, they were ready to address the prompt independently, so they wrote alone, creating a mock outline of their essays, and we reviewed these together as a group. The impo...