Skip to main content

BOOK REVIEW

By Tim Pappageorge




Book Review

If this book is filled with so much common sense--offer choice, give students a voice in their learning-- then why do I find myself invigorated by the potential of my students as I read it?

We want to offer answers, students want questions. We offer safety, they love risk. We want them to play the role of the dutiful student, and they want to play a socially important role, an expert or daring personality. Basically, Armstrong drives home the point that the intense neuroplasticity of adolescent brains makes teaching teens a bit of wild fun, but it's not a game whose rules we, as adults, often fully understand or remember.


For example, one chapter focuses on peer learning communities. In my experience, and through my home school district, we have focused consistently on Cooperative Learning modalities which are informed by the research of David and Roger Johnson at the University of Minnesota. They remind us that cooperative learning is not an activity to do, but it is an awareness that everything that goes on in the classroom should be viewed with the lens of the social scientist. Armstrong, here, offers a similar insight but gets us, as teachers and leaders, to understand the biological bases for this.


In the past 10 years or so, differentiated instruction has continued to enter into the instructional conversation at the high school level. We are learning what our grade school colleagues have been telling us for decades: offering choice and recognizing the important sense of agency in our adolescent learners are really of central concern to the educational process. And yet, we often standardize our approach, and in so doing, we abdicate our own choice to offer students this kind of agency. Armstrong leans into this important issue with specific learning ideas such as homework menus.


Like all brain-based books, the work here tends to over-conclude based on the amount of empirical data available. However, Armstrong is a veteran teacher whose sensibilities--developed over 34 years in the classroom--very much run sympatico with my own. His ideas are practical, and his tone energizes my vision for what my students will accomplish this year.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Classroom Controversy

By Tim Pappageorge
Constructive Controversy     I want to draw my students into a supportive classroom environment that normalizes struggle and controversy. Argument does not have to be a winner-take-call debate or (on the other extreme) a series of head nods to a commonly agreed-upon platitude.  Democracy takes  more work than that.  The empathy and rationality of rich humanism requires greater depth and search, as well.   Even after 21 years of teaching, I am still learning so much about how to set the stage for respectful and engaged discussion.  What about you? Praise, Pressure, and Performance This short unit focuses on setting the norms of inquiry and engagement that will lead to constructive controversy.  Please check out any of the lessons, or the whole unit!  I taught this in the 2013-14 school year in grade 9, but it could easily run in grades 8-11.   This topic is so compelling, I think, because it will help students...
Post a Comment
Read more

Affective Learning

By Tim Pappageorge
Pundits abound with promises that technology can "replace the middleman" in education.  Although I grate against the idea that a thoughtful, concerned, reflective, intelligent, passionate, caring adult--a teacher!--is the equivalent to a business owner who marks up merchandise for profit, the metaphor of the middleman forced me to think about just what, exactly, does the teacher add in a cloud-based, post-2007 , MOOC world, where a myriad of apps and sites (e.g. Khan Academy) can tailor feedback and where content has gotten so cheap (e.g. MIT's free courses, or sites like Coursera --featuring coursework from Stanford, UPenn, and Johns Hopkins--or nifty-looking courses like "Analytics in Course Design" through Dartmouth via Canvas ). Surely, teachers are not simply haggling with students for a better price on learning!  But just the same, I am asking myself what is the value-added I am bringing to my students that cannot be replaced. But if teachers are middle...
Post a Comment
Read more