Skip to main content

Expressing Voice - Poetry Out Loud

Significant Learning: Expressing Voice
The homogenizing forces in education seem to abound these days, with standardized testing, teacher evaluation, and politics involved.  I find that my soul sings as a teacher when I find something worthwhile for my particular students and polishing and prepare it for them in particular, adjusting, tinkering and making it real for them.  In this act of curricular creation, I am expressing my voice as a teacher (albeit filtered through Common Core standards and common assessments).
In turn, we need to create the space to allow students to voice their own ideas and concerns and to take the ideas seriously enough that they can be of consequence.  For example, rather than simply an academic study of poetry, students at my high school learn to perform in through poetryoutloud.org.  Such a shift pushes the learning target away from knowledge exclusively toward product, which represents a shift in the ways of knowing and the configuration of the assessment involved.  Stiggins and Chappuis (2011) suggest a range of target types such as KRSPD (knowledge, reasoning, performance skill, product, and disposition) should be used to align targets with formats that suit the intent of the target.  By assessing poetry through multiple choice or even through selected response, we have traditionally in English departments, focused on Knowledge.  By shifting toward performance, we guide students to learn poetry as performance, much as Louise Rosenblatt said in her foundational text that a poem is not the words on the page but the moment during which those words are read aloud.  A poem is evoked, not analyzed or simply contained by the words on the page.  By examining poetry in this kind of matrix, not simply hinging on Knowledge targets, students can show successful mastery in a range of ways.  I would also argue that the skill of presenting in front of a group and mastering the stage fright involved is more directly transferable to the job market than is knowledge of e.e. cummings (I regret to say!).

Where is it, then, that a teacher can evoke a "poem" writ large?  In what ways is our work in the classroom a song of sorts, the dance moves and the chorus to the song an attractive sing along for the students?  I realize that this metaphor seems dopey or even a bit strained, but could we nudge our view of curriculum in this direction even a little bit at the secondary level?  I have been expressing voice in my own lesson writing through cc.betterlesson.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Affective Learning

Pundits abound with promises that technology can "replace the middleman" in education.  Although I grate against the idea that a thoughtful, concerned, reflective, intelligent, passionate, caring adult--a teacher!--is the equivalent to a business owner who marks up merchandise for profit, the metaphor of the middleman forced me to think about just what, exactly, does the teacher add in a cloud-based, post-2007 , MOOC world, where a myriad of apps and sites (e.g. Khan Academy) can tailor feedback and where content has gotten so cheap (e.g. MIT's free courses, or sites like Coursera --featuring coursework from Stanford, UPenn, and Johns Hopkins--or nifty-looking courses like "Analytics in Course Design" through Dartmouth via Canvas ). Surely, teachers are not simply haggling with students for a better price on learning!  But just the same, I am asking myself what is the value-added I am bringing to my students that cannot be replaced. But if teachers are middle...

Intention Deficit? Try hooking students with Why?

Lesson Hooks-- Cultivating an intention-rich classroom. Cognitive scientists point out the massively effective habit of recruiting and maintaining focus in the learning process.  For learners--be they adults, children, or teens in between--the challenges of staying focused in our "intention - deficit" society can create real challenges to meaning making.  In schools, we throw unending stimuli, ideas, facts, and figures at our students and wonder why they have trouble retaining.  The point of starting a lesson in an interesting, purposeful way is to set the course of intention forward. One potential issue arises from the importance of setting the stage for students to become vested in what they are learning .  Why are they being asked to learn a given topic?  Why is it significant or important?  Of course, drawing on their prior learning through discussion can create important bridges of learning as students connect old understandings and new co...

BOOK REVIEW

Book Review If this book is filled with so much common sense--offer choice, give students a voice in their learning-- then why do I find myself invigorated by the potential of my students as I read it? We want to offer answers, students want questions. We offer safety, they love risk. We want them to play the role of the dutiful student, and they want to play a socially important role, an expert or daring personality. Basically, Armstrong drives home the point that the intense neuroplasticity of adolescent brains makes teaching teens a bit of wild fun, but it's not a game whose rules we, as adults, often fully understand or remember. For example, one chapter focuses on peer learning communities. In my experience, and through my home school district, we have focused consistently on Cooperative Learning modalities which are informed by the research of David and Roger Johnson at the University of Minnesota. They remind us that cooperative learning is not an activity to do, ...