Tell Me Why You Think That! Do students learn better when they aim to agree or when they debate an issue? It's a trick question, as David and Roger Johnson point out in their meta-analysis of discussion modes: it turns out that guiding students to engage in controversy in constructive ways leads to greater cognitive and affective gains than either of the typically practiced models of concurrence or debate. Academic Controversy. Is a discussion format in which students switch roles after arguing their points. Seeing the issue from another's perspective can be truly enlightening, and it helps students to engage in active listening--good for their interpersonal relationships in class and for increasingly the level of complexity with which they see a given topic. Tough Talk is a recent book on the topic which has challenged my thinking. Role-Playing leads students to have both the dramatic immediacy of arguing in role and the perspective of a broad view that they constr
Teach with significance! This blog encourages reflective literacy practice.