Skip to main content

BOOK REVIEW

By Tim Pappageorge




Book Review

If this book is filled with so much common sense--offer choice, give students a voice in their learning-- then why do I find myself invigorated by the potential of my students as I read it?

We want to offer answers, students want questions. We offer safety, they love risk. We want them to play the role of the dutiful student, and they want to play a socially important role, an expert or daring personality. Basically, Armstrong drives home the point that the intense neuroplasticity of adolescent brains makes teaching teens a bit of wild fun, but it's not a game whose rules we, as adults, often fully understand or remember.


For example, one chapter focuses on peer learning communities. In my experience, and through my home school district, we have focused consistently on Cooperative Learning modalities which are informed by the research of David and Roger Johnson at the University of Minnesota. They remind us that cooperative learning is not an activity to do, but it is an awareness that everything that goes on in the classroom should be viewed with the lens of the social scientist. Armstrong, here, offers a similar insight but gets us, as teachers and leaders, to understand the biological bases for this.


In the past 10 years or so, differentiated instruction has continued to enter into the instructional conversation at the high school level. We are learning what our grade school colleagues have been telling us for decades: offering choice and recognizing the important sense of agency in our adolescent learners are really of central concern to the educational process. And yet, we often standardize our approach, and in so doing, we abdicate our own choice to offer students this kind of agency. Armstrong leans into this important issue with specific learning ideas such as homework menus.


Like all brain-based books, the work here tends to over-conclude based on the amount of empirical data available. However, Armstrong is a veteran teacher whose sensibilities--developed over 34 years in the classroom--very much run sympatico with my own. His ideas are practical, and his tone energizes my vision for what my students will accomplish this year.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning with Significance

By Tim Pappageorge
What is Learning of Significance? By helping students to make their own connections and understandings, these awesome teachers of significance have helped students to find meanings that will resonate with them. How to do it? connect with real issues right-size the learning task (and then make it even more challenging) problematize texts use multimodal prompts and texts show students how experts make meaning What does it look like? English -- a student researchers the war in Afghanistan with a partner and presents his findings about the Soviet invasion, the Taliban, and the U.S. involvement following 9/11.   These same students connect this powerful new knowledge to The Kite Runner .  In turn, the complex events leading up to and following 9/11 help focus the reading of the novel and vice versa ; as meanings become connected, webs of understanding reinforce significant knowledge. Science -- a teacher challenges his students to read a textbook excerpt describing cellular
Post a Comment
Read more

The Political Power of Language in ELA

By Tim Pappageorge
Politics and Literature In her landmark essay, Literacy in Three Metaphors , Sylvia Scribner directs our attention a three-fold purpose in appropriating literacy skill and insight: adaptation, power, and grace.  Adaptation, she allows, features the work skills that students need in order to be able to adapt and survive; as with organisms within the metaphor of natural selection, literacy in this metaphor focuses on being able to survive in the "real world" and "work skills."  This metaphor dominates public discourse on literacy education at the present time because we have anxiety about the  shape that our knowledge economy is taking and where the jobs will be in 5-10 or more years.  This metaphor has swollen itself and has pushed aside two the metaphors which have constituted the fibre of our  culture and democracy.  We need again, to think about how language enshrines political power within the context of political rights, and we need to attend to the personal cu
Post a Comment
Read more
By Tim Pappageorge
Art and Controversy (in AP English Language).   Students learn best when constructive controversy is engaged (Johnson and Johnson, 2009), and the art of Barbara Kruger gets us to rethink assumptions by introducing controversy. Here, a floating hand holds up an ID-card sized sign that offers a disturbing message, and  Kruger gets viewers to stand outside of their typical understandings.  In formulating these ideas and in making these juxtapositions, Kruger destabilizes accepted connotations of certain words such as "friend" or "belong," or in this case, a philosophical phrase.  Literacy researcher Rebecca Trites calls this "critical literacy" ( Disturbing the Universe, 2004), and it is the type of read-think-write move that causes us to question and push back against ideologies and patterns that form our assumptions.   It's important to incorporate texts, images, ideas that set the stage for students to question in a substantial way. Enjoy th
Post a Comment
Read more